Scrumpy wrote:
Maybe if I was as good as you Fabio I wouldn't think that-
Iīm not claiming to be the best chopper in here... I leave that to Rey (that loves the king seat) and Claf (that is the best chopper in here, and the one that less bitches about it)... Iīm just saying marco is overrated. All his "I love everyone, I buy advantage to everyone, Iīm mr nice guy (vote for me)" bullshit, doesnīt change the fact heīs just an average chopper as most of the people in here, who turns to be considered a top chopper. I mean-- HE IS NOT. half the people vote for him cause heīs a "nice guy" more than cause his chop is good. Iīm sicking tired of seeing better chops being underrated cause marcoīs pieces of crap are usually overrated. Call it envy, jealousy or whatever. I just like to give credit to people who deserve credit. Marcoīs entry in the H2H... SUCKED!! Badly... Iīve seen less skilled choppers make better chops than his and yet get less flatering and appreciation on their works... for instance... caf was eliminated on the h2h... her chop deserved to be in the top ones, for originality, and very good execution. candron did an excelent chop (sorry scion, but he did), yet, I see no mentions to his name. Did you see people talking about it? Zetape did an excelent chop and some morons like Showcase said he didnīt use the source and therefore didnīt deserve a vote. All of them are better in quality AND skills than marcoīs... want a review on marcoīs 5 wins?
1. Entrance to hell: very nice change of background. thatīs all. extraordinary how all that fire behind the gates canīt illuminate the back of the gate, that is brightened in the front and darkened in the back (exactly the opposite as it should be)
who should have won: Designed2522
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/139048/votes.html
(except for the lens flare... but the overall surpasses it...)
2. Undercover Jedi... it was ok. No real competition, though eveīs idea was more original, although less skilled.
3. Points of View: ESCHER????? Go fuck yerself marco... you did a bad chop, with all the lights and shadows off, with no sense at all, and decide to call it Escher to make it look like you did a piece of art??????
who should have won: Infected
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/139603/votes.html and by DOZENS of votes ahead of marco... Lights are perfect... visual is great... and the idea is great... infected didnīt have to invent an excuse to make his chop plausible... he told a story with one image and no words.
furthermore, Tesore, caprix3 and anabe should also be ahead of him... by a large votes difference...
4. Sad Fate of Mr. T: "extension & repair work and further focal blurring to heighten depth of field," WHERE is yer depth of field mr. ballistic???? You unfocused the background to disguise the HUGE distortion in the background you did... which can be visualized by comparing the original cars with the ones in yer chop. You should first try to learn whatīs depth of field before claiming to have in in yer chop. The only thing I see there is a poor distortion to try to make it look like the cat is on his back feet without looking 3 feet tall, followed by a massive blur to undercover the distortion. Call it depth of field is the same as calling people stupid for NOT SEEING ITīS A DEPTH OF FIELD.
who should have won: Goat1981
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/139666/votes.html clean original chop, great idea, and he still had to deal with marco bitching all the time about his borders, that didnīt interfere AT ALL in the chop.
5. Patience: biggest joke of the show... trully original to make a stone frog into a stone frog... Lrossaīs Leo shoulda beaten his chop hard, not tied.
I could go on and on, but I believe the more I say the truth about marco, the more I piss his followers... so Iīll just stop here and let ya guys be confused about whether a chop is good or not, and keep thinking every piece of crap marco pulls is genious just because he has 136 wins (WOW!) out of his almost 1000 entries...