Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:38 pm   Reply with quote         

Werdnaibor wrote:

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

But I can't draw well, and I'm at work.

Wish I could get away with getting paid to BS online. I'd be a rich man. Speaking of getting paid to play on the web.... Where's TheShaman at?

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:40 pm   Reply with quote         

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Easy. There's no face.

You've lost me with that reason.

How? you don't think it's a valid reason that there's no discernible face?
OK.

There's the original face of the raccoon, and the worker's face is covered by his hat, as he originally existed in the external. Yes, it's invalid, because it makes no sense.

Well, to me, it makes sense. I can't see the face of the worker, it's too dark, so it's not there, right? Only when I get up and look down on it from the top, can I see the face. So don't call it invalid, please.
Besides, I didn't even have to answer to your inquiry!

I'll still call it invalid, because it's the brim of a black hat. You can't see his face because it isn't there. It's dark because it is a black hat, not shadow.

No, it's visible in the external.
TJ said it well. It all depends on the method. His method has not been constructive, IMO. I think it would be nice to PM a corrected version, that would be most helpful. But it shouldn't be just nitpicking.

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:40 pm   Reply with quote         

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:44 pm   Reply with quote         

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:45 pm   Reply with quote         

anabe wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

anabe wrote:

Easy. There's no face.

You've lost me with that reason.

How? you don't think it's a valid reason that there's no discernible face?
OK.

There's the original face of the raccoon, and the worker's face is covered by his hat, as he originally existed in the external. Yes, it's invalid, because it makes no sense.

Well, to me, it makes sense. I can't see the face of the worker, it's too dark, so it's not there, right? Only when I get up and look down on it from the top, can I see the face. So don't call it invalid, please.
Besides, I didn't even have to answer to your inquiry!

I'll still call it invalid, because it's the brim of a black hat. You can't see his face because it isn't there. It's dark because it is a black hat, not shadow.

No, it's visible in the external.
TJ said it well. It all depends on the method. His method has not been constructive, IMO. I think it would be nice to PM a corrected version, that would be most helpful. But it shouldn't be just nitpicking.

This has to be some sort of joke to drive me insane. The external was mirrored and looks the same in the entry. No face visible in either, because it is covered by an opaque object, the brim of the hat. I can see it clearly on my phone, which is what I'm using right now.

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:49 pm   Reply with quote         

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:52 pm   Reply with quote         

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

But I can't draw well, and I'm at work.

Wish I could get away with getting paid to BS online. I'd be a rich man. Speaking of getting paid to play on the web.... Where's TheShaman at?

Have a phone with a data plan and work on the weekend as a security officer making very little. You would not be a rich man.

Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:58 pm   Reply with quote         

Werdnaibor wrote:

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

But I can't draw well, and I'm at work.

Wish I could get away with getting paid to BS online. I'd be a rich man. Speaking of getting paid to play on the web.... Where's TheShaman at?

Have a phone with a data plan and work on the weekend as a security officer making very little. You would not be a rich man.

Just kidding. Now get back to work!!

Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:02 pm   Reply with quote         

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

But I can't draw well, and I'm at work.

Wish I could get away with getting paid to BS online. I'd be a rich man. Speaking of getting paid to play on the web.... Where's TheShaman at?

Have a phone with a data plan and work on the weekend as a security officer making very little. You would not be a rich man.

Just kidding. Now get back to work!!

But it's so boring. I may have no choice though, as my battery is approaching 20%.

Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:15 pm   Reply with quote         

Werdnaibor wrote:

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

TJ wrote:

Werdnaibor wrote:

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

But I can't draw well, and I'm at work.

Wish I could get away with getting paid to BS online. I'd be a rich man. Speaking of getting paid to play on the web.... Where's TheShaman at?

Have a phone with a data plan and work on the weekend as a security officer making very little. You would not be a rich man.

Just kidding. Now get back to work!!

But it's so boring. I may have no choice though, as my battery is approaching 20%.

.
.
.

Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:58 pm   Reply with quote         

_________________

Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:09 pm   Reply with quote         

Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:37 pm   Reply with quote         

kittie wrote:

Everybody shut up and add to my drawing thread!

There's a thread with my name in the title. I'll make sure this doesn't go ANYWHERE

Ummm, USA never went to the moon. Evolution is a lie. Free masons run the world. Racism is a good thing. Your country's soccer team sucks. It's "soccer," not "football."

Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:41 pm   Reply with quote         

shane.e.randall wrote:

Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:58 pm   Reply with quote