Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Entry Removal Requests - Third Reich: The Return - This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
the burning couch
Location: I don't know, but it sure is dark in here
|
 Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:13 am Reply with quote
...and even more offensive is the "chop" itself. I mean I probably coulda done that better with a mouse clenched between my butt cheeks and a blindfold on. 
_________________
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.~ Mal
|
Tawiskaro
Location: New York
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:23 am Reply with quote
JClark8220 wrote: Very offensive.
Would you find it offensive if the head of Hillary Clinton were replaced with that of George Bush?
Something similar appeared here not long ago: http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/117783/votes.html
Bad chops and sophomoric political commentary seem to go hand in hand. I will not complain if it's the left hand or the right hand, unless the chop gets unbelievably ugly. Neither of these meets my standard. Let it stay. Freedom of speech, and all of that.
[Edited--it took me a few minutes to find a sample for comparison]
|
Paul Von Stetina
Location: Deep Shit
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:44 am Reply with quote
This is a subject that I find very interesting...
and vhat vould be funny, vould be a picture of The Burning Couch wis a mouse clenched betveen his butt cheeks, wis a blindfold on...   or how about an artist rendering?...Micose?
|
blue_lurker
Location: Australia
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:51 am Reply with quote
the burning couch wrote: ...and even more offensive is the "chop" itself. I mean I probably coulda done that better with a mouse clenched between my butt cheeks and a blindfold on.
Damn it now every ones gunna know how I get that special chop style Im infamous for
|
Paul Von Stetina
Location: Deep Shit
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:51 am Reply with quote
OMG, I was looking at that horrible picture, and I said to myself, where is the source? Then I noticed that it was the source!
|
blue_lurker
Location: Australia
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:53 am Reply with quote
By bringing attention to the image you are just helping to expand its viewing audience. Leave them alone and they will just leave because they are not getting the attention they seek.
|
Micose
Location: Quebec (CAN) & France
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:54 am Reply with quote
Tawiskaro wrote: JClark8220 wrote: Very offensive.
Would you find it offensive if the head of Hillary Clinton were replaced with that of George Bush?
Something similar appeared here not long ago: http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/117783/votes.html
Bad chops and sophomoric political commentary seem to go hand in hand. I will not complain if it's the left hand or the right hand, unless the chop gets unbelievably ugly. Neither of these meets my standard. Let it stay. Freedom of speech, and all of that.
[Edited--it took me a few minutes to find a sample for comparison]
'king right mate...ABOUT THE FIRST PART
|
dumbat
Location: Sydney
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:55 am Reply with quote
blue_lurker wrote: By bringing attention to the image you are just helping to expand its viewing audience
it's true - i've now set it as the wallpaper on all the pc's in the office
|
NOGOODSK8RPUNK
Location: hum let me think, oh i know, if you look real hard i sometimes appear in your forum's text box
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:56 am Reply with quote
Tawiskaro wrote: JClark8220 wrote: Very offensive.
Would you find it offensive if the head of Hillary Clinton were replaced with that of George Bush?
Something similar appeared here not long ago: http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/117783/votes.html
Bad chops and sophomoric political commentary seem to go hand in hand. I will not complain if it's the left hand or the right hand, unless the chop gets unbelievably ugly. Neither of these meets my standard. Let it stay. Freedom of speech, and all of that.
[Edited--it took me a few minutes to find a sample for comparison] agreed w/ the addition of freedom of expression 
|
blue_lurker
Location: Australia
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am Reply with quote
dumbat wrote: blue_lurker wrote: By bringing attention to the image you are just helping to expand its viewing audience
it's true - i've now set it as the wallpaper on all the pc's in the office
LMAO
See I told ya so
|
Paul Von Stetina
Location: Deep Shit
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:32 am Reply with quote
Sorry Blurk... did you post the source?  lol, I guess that picture doesn't suck that bad, but it does blow  There are some great entries from it, I will say that
|
|
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:46 am Reply with quote
Defending this with the "freedom of expression" excuse just doesn't hold water.
I doubt you'd defend someone's artistic expression in the form of child pornography.
And I could think of 20 other creative "expressions" right now that would have you screaming for the mods.
Because in reality, you don't support true freedom of expression - and rightfully so.
You support freedom of expression on your own terms.
And in this case, your terms are ok with the display of swastikas and nazi imagery.
|
dumbat
Location: Sydney
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:49 am Reply with quote
i think it is very unreasonable to equate child pornography with political expression
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Entry Removal Requests - Third Reich: The Return - This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
