|
She@iT
Shouldn't the external be clear like the source? and not blurry?
|
|
|
vicspa
Depth of field, ... and she's got some depth.
|
|
|
She@iT
So I don't see vicspa saying there's anything wrong with this pic. Ok, I guess it's suppose to look this way.
|
|
|
She@iT
But for us people still trying to learn, knowing what should be blurred and what shouldn't...doesn't help.
|
|
|
Luxwiz
She@iT Vic is wrong here,I do agree with you about the blur I would also like to see the chick in focus... anyhow these are all hot chick votes not execution ones,they should actually have a "hot chick vote" category after theme just for blackfox LOL
|
|
|
She@iT
Thanks for letting me know that Lux. I was beginning to think, I was wrong about this.
|
|
|
vicspa
Not a question of right and wrong, but a question of like or not like. I like the blurr. Maybe it should've been reversed, sharp chic, blurred bile racks.
|
|
|
vicspa
Lux, as a photographer you know of depth of field
|
|
|
vicspa
f/2.8 vs f/22
|
|
|
vicspa
blackfox blurred the wrong rack. hehehe
|
|
|
vicspa
Let's not go tit for tat. ;)
|
|
|
She@iT
[img] photoshopcontest.com...
|
|
|
She@iT
We are not suppose to use womens bodies to get votes. I have a few times.
|
|
|
She@iT
[img] photoshopcontest.com...
|
|
|
She@iT
[img] i64.tinypic.com... When Shooterman was telling me how to fix her body size.
|
|
|
She@iT
[img] photoshopcontest.com...
|
|
|
Luxwiz
Maybe it should've been reversed, sharp chic, blurred bile racks... exactly what I meant by that :)
|
|
|
Luxwiz
and if the chick was taller you could tit-le it " Nice C rack " :P
|
|
|
Insomnix
You know. If I focused on the bike rack with manual focus and then she walked in to frame walking very slow, i could quite well have come out that way. hehe ;)
|
|