Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Gatherings and Meetings - Round 3 Replacement - Reply to topic
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Eve
Site Moderator
Location: Planet Earth
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:16 pm Reply with quote
cafn8d wrote:
Anyway, Arc is chopping, I believe. But what's the OFFICIAL word on how to handle this?
a few girls are safe in Brazil tonight?
I thought we were in agreement to allow subs in situations like this.
_________________ If you're going to walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!
thank u Tawiskaro
|
arcaico
Location: Brazil
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:16 pm Reply with quote
ScionShade wrote: Grefix did say it best.
Mr. Succinct, and to the point making me look bad aye?
Alright Penguin Boy.
I'll remember this!
i still love you brother.
_________________
TheShaman wrote: fine fine! I'm an idiot!
|
arcaico
Location: Brazil
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:23 pm Reply with quote
Eve wrote: cafn8d wrote:
Anyway, Arc is chopping, I believe. But what's the OFFICIAL word on how to handle this?
a few girls are safe in Brazil tonight?
I thought we were in agreement to allow subs in situations like this.
if we are not, place DLowrie back in the tourney. I'm ok with that.
I'm chopping anyway... just let me know the final decision.
_________________
TheShaman wrote: fine fine! I'm an idiot!
|
cafn8d
Location: Massachusetts
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:28 pm Reply with quote
Eve wrote: cafn8d wrote:
Anyway, Arc is chopping, I believe. But what's the OFFICIAL word on how to handle this?
a few girls are safe in Brazil tonight?
I thought we were in agreement to allow subs in situations like this.
I thought so, too, but no one who has any authority over substituting one name for another has confirmed Arc as the substitute.
Gref made a good point that I agree with. However, if there are subs, it should be the highest-voted loser, imo. Just like how the subs were chosen from Round 1 to fill in for Round 2 spots.
And I added Scion's blurb (in my last post) because I agree with that, too: no, it isn't fair. Tough situation when someone forfeits. Nothing that's done can possibly be fair to everyone...
|
splodge
Location: Yorkshire,
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:29 pm Reply with quote
who's around to change the code so arc or Janfet can post in hub's place???
i dont think it's going to happen
|
rockyjob
Location: Anywhere but where I am.
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:00 pm Reply with quote
splodge wrote: who's around to change the code so arc or Janfet can post in hub's place???
i dont think it's going to happen get huubb to post arcs chop, or can't you mods upload it for him.. dont change the name.. do that afterwards... you guys can change it if someone uploads it wrong right? Use something you guys have then change it later!!!
|
Pearcinator
Location: NSW - Australia
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:21 pm Reply with quote
Lemme just make this clear....
If you are choosing the loser who got the most votes in the 2nd round (Arcaico) then thats fine.
I you are basing it on percentages (like it SHOULD have been to begin with) then thats NOT fine by me! Cos that would have put me in the 2nd round with 49.2% of the votes. If you have chosen by 'loser with most votes' to begin with then it should REMAIN that way.
Ive already complained about this decision and it seems i have lost...but if you decide to use percentages (like it should have been) then i will have no choice but to whinge and complain some more!
|
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:34 pm Reply with quote
Pearcinator wrote: Lemme just make this clear....
If you are choosing the loser who got the most votes in the 2nd round (Arcaico) then thats fine.
I you are basing it on percentages (like it SHOULD have been to begin with) then thats NOT fine by me! Cos that would have put me in the 2nd round with 49.2% of the votes. If you have chosen by 'loser with most votes' to begin with then it should REMAIN that way.
Ive already complained about this decision and it seems i have lost...but if you decide to use percentages (like it should have been) then i will have no choice but to whinge and complain some more!
Good point
_________________ "Recently, NASA scientists discovered that most people love to play video games but hate to die in fiery airplane crashes."
|
FootFungas
Location: East Coast!
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:20 pm Reply with quote
Everybody is arguing and no real decisions are being made.
I think a win-win solution would be to just kick Jerico out of the tournament.
Its what best for me, you and the World as a whole.
_________________ Look out behind you!
|
Eve
Site Moderator
Location: Planet Earth
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:31 pm Reply with quote
why do you see this as an argument...it isn't.
For the record, ARC, Janfet saw huub's announcement and pm'd me that she'd be willing to fill his spot. I saw it was an opportunity, and rather than stand idly by and do nothing and see another no show, I acted on it.
Hopefully, Supak, our master coder, can make the arrangements to allow Arc to upload his image.
g'night!
_________________ If you're going to walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!
thank u Tawiskaro
|
|
Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:31 pm Reply with quote
It should definitely be the highest vote getter if it's anyone. If that person is unavailable, then it goes to the next highest vote getter. That's the way it worked when I took Chris's place in the tourney a few years ago.
If the rules get changed, you can't do it in the middle of the tourney (unless of course it's to let PhotoshopMaster have an automatic IN to the final rounds).
|
jasper
Location: Location, Location.
|
Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:52 am Reply with quote
My 2 cents is that there is precedent for adding someone in later rounds. Chrispis was added in the first H2H in Round 4 and nearly went on to win...however, well...most know how that ended! ;p
|
janetdog
Location: Las Vegas Baby!
|
Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:28 am Reply with quote
This is starting to look and smell like 'good ole boys' in action.
All I know is that I would be p-o'd if a loser from an early round got a second chance in a single elimination tournament and beat me for prizes.
What's that funny sound? It's the rules being run over by a truck.
_________________ chop chop
|
annajon
Location: DEAD THREAD DUMPINGGROUND NEAR YOU
|
Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:38 am Reply with quote
I am thinking this,
Round 3 is what we are dealing with, so, a replacement in the brackets should come from ROUND 3. The Highest Percentage loser, like P. said, of round 3 should fill an open bracket.
That means you only need to fill a position when both choppers can't turn up. Otherwise it is just the one person going through who did show up.
And all the other changes everybody was talking about, those need to be taken into account for next year.
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Gatherings and Meetings - Round 3 Replacement - Reply to topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|