Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - Objection to yesterday's winner... - This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Paul Von Stetina
Location: Deep Shit
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:31 pm Reply with quote
TofuTheGreat wrote: janetdog wrote: I don't know what's worse, A completely sniped $50 dollar winner or A $50 winner with only 25 votes.
I've heard crabs is bad. Don't know personally though.
Just in case Tofu....
|
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:45 pm Reply with quote
janetdog wrote: I don't know what's worse, A completely sniped $50 dollar winner or A $50 winner with only 25 votes.
JanetDog...Remember when getting over 10 votes was good and getting over 20 was really good and getting over 30 was considered amazing.
|
Paul Von Stetina
Location: Deep Shit
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:48 pm Reply with quote
Chopper wrote: janetdog wrote: I don't know what's worse, A completely sniped $50 dollar winner or A $50 winner with only 25 votes.
JanetDog...Remember when getting over 10 votes was good and getting over 20 was really good and getting over 30 was considered amazing.
That's how I feel about my work now...
|
nat_g31
Location: Permanent vacation from Nor Cal
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:07 pm Reply with quote
gran,
I do agree that had I seen the external I probably would not have voted for it. I thought there were various elements in play and he put it all together. Regardless, a win is a win and the image was appealing.
With that said, had I created the original, I would probably be upset that someone posted the image with minimal changes as their own work.
I would have no issues had the external been posted from the get-go. Oh well, time to move on. . .
_________________
“I had a dream I could buy my way to heaven, when I awoke I spent that on a necklace.”~~~ Kanye West
|
janetdog
Location: Las Vegas Baby!
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:16 pm Reply with quote
Chopper wrote: janetdog wrote: I don't know what's worse, A completely sniped $50 dollar winner or A $50 winner with only 25 votes.
JanetDog...Remember when getting over 10 votes was good and getting over 20 was really good and getting over 30 was considered amazing.
I won with 8.
But, We didn't have 25 to give away back then.
_________________ chop chop
|
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:16 pm Reply with quote
Here's one of mine that won a contest that heavily used the external image:
The external image:
I agree, it's not as cool as seeing something like Claf can put together, but if the image looks cool and some chopping was involved, then I don't think it should necessarily be flagged and pulled from a contest.
|
bigbuck
Location: Australia
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:25 pm Reply with quote
pakimo wrote: There are loads of winning images on here that uses this amount of source vs externals. Just take a look on the recent tomatoimage that just won, or the burned hand, or the car. And thats in the recent 10.
So it is not unusual that this happends.
I think you react the way you do because the external image was more powerfull than usual.
I don't think it's about the amount of external source used. It's that the naive voter might assume that there has been a lot of PS work going on...
....and I suppose there has....by the wallpaper creator....not the person who used it as their external.
I suppose this is where the anonymous comps are a little flawed. If it was a normal daily, the chopper would have been called straight away for using an obvious wallpaper as 97% of their chop. Voters will have seen comments and voted in a more 'informed' manner.
Whether intentional or not, it's the sort of chop that can be a bit misleading to voters that don't instantly recognise it as a wallpaper.
A http://tineye.com/ search shows that this image is all over the web at wallpaper sites etc. Maybe this guy over at devo is the actual artist, since he's selling prints?
http://webby85.deviantart.com/art/my-wonderland-59915280
|
janetdog
Location: Las Vegas Baby!
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:51 pm Reply with quote
Maybe spike should send webby85 $49.50 or 99% of the winnings. It is offered for sale.
_________________ chop chop
|
splodge
Location: Yorkshire,
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:16 pm Reply with quote
i was going to do that, i think he did enough the copyright he cut off was not the original
|
TJ
Location: Utah, USA
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:37 pm Reply with quote
ReyRey wrote: I think the voters are to blame. Do your homework. Ask questions.
Be a smart educated voter. Make the world a better place. ................yeah yeah.......I know..........I'm an asshole.....Sue me.
I think we should send the money to the guy who made the source.
I hate to admit it, but I think your right Rey....... you are a asshole and thinking of suing your ass.
just kidding!!!
I wish now that the exterial was included with the entry. I don't have the time to investigate all that I vote for.
Very simple...I went big and thought this was a ton of work, liked it and voted.
I try to use my own stuff as externals and will go out of my way to create them if needed, but sometimes its to damn easy to google it. I'll keep going what I do and will try to add a link to what I brought in.
If anyone has a problem with my thoughts.... sue Rey first.
Good call Gran
_________________ The good life is what you find when you stop looking for a better one.
|
glennhanna
Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:43 pm Reply with quote
bigbuck wrote:
ok! I see the owl now! great job! amazing.
|
Mir
Location: Malta E.U.
|
Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:36 am Reply with quote
bigbuck wrote:
I don't think it's about the amount of external source used. It's that the naive voter might assume that there has been a lot of PS work going on...
....and I suppose there has....by the wallpaper creator....not the person who used it as their external.
I suppose this is where the anonymous comps are a little flawed. If it was a normal daily, the chopper would have been called straight away for using an obvious wallpaper as 97% of their chop. Voters will have seen comments and voted in a more 'informed' manner.
Whether intentional or not, it's the sort of chop that can be a bit misleading to voters that don't instantly recognise it as a wallpaper.
A http://tineye.com/ search shows that this image is all over the web at wallpaper sites etc. Maybe this guy over at devo is the actual artist, since he's selling prints?
http://webby85.deviantart.com/art/my-wonderland-59915280
I totally agree,I for one had not seen this wallpaper before and not knowing who had posted and therefore his ability to do this from scratch or not I just thought it was a great entry and voted for it.
|
nat_g31
Location: Permanent vacation from Nor Cal
|
Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:10 am Reply with quote
glennhanna wrote: bigbuck wrote:
ok! I see the owl now! great job! amazing.
_________________
“I had a dream I could buy my way to heaven, when I awoke I spent that on a necklace.”~~~ Kanye West
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - Objection to yesterday's winner... - This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|