billtvshow wrote:
Ok all you people who have been talking about the problems in voting in supak's thread, make yourself heard here. This is an opportunity to support some exceptionally fair and strong stats that can handle the pressures of change over time in the way voting has occured on this site. I've put a ton of time, thought, and development into this.
<snip>
I'm not saying change any way the site is currently run or the way things are voted for now and I'm not saying to get rid of vpp, I'm just suggesting two new, relatively simple, statistical measures (RPP and VM) that will allow for the changes in site activity and voting limits that have occurred over time.
I will be willing to write some semi-pseudo code as best I can for implementing this. It would be great just to test it out and see what happens. I know of some issues that will come up with it regarding very early contests on the site, but we can work on that. Any takers?
Bill (Stephen), this sounds great. These are two very good ideas. Especially the "voting magnetism".
I took a course in statistics a while back when I was an engineering student in "collidge". Maybe we could have statistical measures such as the mean, standard deviation, median, mode, etc? I think it would be interesting to see how many votes an "average" post is getting in a contest. And what the mode would be as well.
Assuming voting patterns follow a normal distribution (the bell curve) we could assume that something like 66% of all posts will fall within one standard deviation of the mean (if I remember correctly), 95% within two standard deviations, and Metalic, of course, will "blow the curve".
Let me know if you want any assistance with your ideas, although it sounds like you have a very good grasp of everything.